The phenotype of the generated DCs was assessed by morphologic observation and detection of specific surface markers by flow cytometry (FCM). According to the manufacturer’s protocol, CD4+CD25− and CD4+CD25+ cell populations were separated from purified CD4+T cells using a mouse Treg isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA). As determined by FCM, the CD4+CD25+ populations were >95% pure, and the CD4+CD25− populations were 98% pure. Antigen presenting cells (APCs) used for T-cell proliferation

in vitro were obtained from pan-T-cell-depleted splenocytes of untreated, age-matched female BALB/c mice and treated with 25 μg/mL mitomycin C (Sigma) for 30 min in 5% CO2 at 37°C (22). For suppression assays, 1 × 105 CD4+CD25− T cells/well, 5 × 104 CD4+CD25+ T cells/well or both populations were cultured in 96-well U-bottom plates with see more 1 × 105 APCs/well in triplicate for 72 h at 37°C in complete RPMI-1640 medium (0·2 mL/well). Cells in culture were stimulated with 1 μg/mL soluble anti-CD3 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA) in the presence or absence of 0·5 μg/mL rSj16 or 0·5 μg/mL OVA (Sigma). Proliferation was determined after incubating with 0·5 μCi/well 3H-thymidine and measuring incorporation during the final 16–18 h of a 3-day culturing period. IL-10, IL-4, TGF-β and IFN-γ concentrations

in the supernatants of antigen-stimulated cells were quantified using an ELISA www.selleckchem.com/products/ch5424802.html kit (Bender Med Systems, Vienna, Austria), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Intracellular cytokines were detected by FCM as previously described (23). Briefly, 1 × 106/mL cells stimulated with PMA, ionomycin and Monensin (Sigma) in complete RPMI 1640 medium at 37°C in 5% CO2. After 4–6 h, cells were harvested and stained according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The Mouse Regulatory T Cell Staining Kit

selleck chemicals (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for the analysis of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T-cell induction. Pooled splenic and lymph node cells from immunized mice or from cocultures were surface-stained with FITC anti-CD4 monoclonal (mAb) and APC anti-CD25 mAb. After surface staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm and then stained intracellularly with PE anti-Foxp3 mAb or PE IgG2a rat immunoglobulin (Ig) control antibody (Ab), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Surface markers expressed by DCs were determined by FCM using the following mAbs: FITC anti-CD80 mAb, PE anti-CD86 mAb, PE anti-CD40 mAb and FITC anti-MHC II mAb (eBioscience). Cell staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One-way anova and two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used in our statistical analysis; SNK method was used for multiple comparisons. A P-value <0·05 was considered statistically significant.