Figure 3 Cross section of representative fibers. The fibers were fabricated by electrospinning 20% (w/v) PS solutions with various THF/DMF ratios. (A, B) 4:1, (C, D) 1:1, and (E, F) 0:6 v/v. RH 60%, collecting distance 15 cm, feeding rate 1.5 ml/h, and applied voltage 12 kV. Figure 4 Cross section of representative PS grooved fibers obtained from different concentrations. (A) 10% (w/v), see more (B) 15% (w/v), (C) 25% (w/v), and (D) 30% (w/v). THF/DMF ratio 1:1 v/v, RH 60%,

collecting distance 15 cm, feeding rate 1.5 ml/h, applied voltage 12 kV. In order to control the secondary structure as well as the diameter of grooved nanofibers, we also investigated other process parameters using 10% (w/v) PS solution (THF/DMF ratio, 1:1 v/v). Overall, applied AZD1152 mw voltage, collecting distance, and

feeding rate had little effect on the secondary morphology and fiber diameter, but relative humidity exerted great PS-341 mouse influence on diameter of grooved PS nanofibers. Figure  5 shows the beaded free PS nanofibers obtained under a relative humidity of 40%. Inspiringly, the average diameter was only 326 ± 50 nm, and there were six to eight grooves well distributed along the axis of nanofibers. To the best of our knowledge, the average diameter of electrospun PS fibers was usually more than 1 μm, so these were the finest grooved nanofibers reported until now. The sharp decreased diameter of grooved nanofibers may be due to the lower relative humidity [22]. In this case, a relatively smaller amount of water diffused into the solution jet causes a delayed

solidification, then leaving enough time for the jet to elongate due to Coulomb forces and whipping instability during traveling to the collector. Hence, grooved PS nanofibers with finer diameter are expected. Figure 5 SEM pictures of grooved nanofibers electrospun from 10% PS solution. (A, B) Grooved nanofibers and (C) cross section. THF/DMF ratio 1:1 v/v, RH 40%, collecting distance 15 cm, feeding rate 1.5 ml/h, and applied voltage 12 kV. Exploration of the formation mechanism of grooved texture Figure  6 shows the morphology of nanofibers electrospun from 10% (w/v) PS solutions with various THF/DMF ratios. Bowl-like Baf-A1 concentration beads were obtained using pure THF as solvent. The outer surface of the bowl was porous, which is similar to nanofibers electrospun from 20% (w/v) PS/THF solution. Beaded fibers were formed when THF/DMF ratio was no less than 2:1 (v/v), it should be pointed out that nearly every bead had an elongated large void on the surface when THF/DMF ratio was higher than 2:1 (v/v), and most nanofibers between beads were single grooved (Figure  6C,D,E,F,G,H and Figure  7A,B,C). For the large void on the bead surface, the rapid evaporation of volatile THF (vapor pressure, 19.07 kPa) and subsequent transformation of the THF-rich region into voids could be the main reason.