05. Results The average values of body mass and body composition, as well as chosen hematological variables are presented in Tables 1 and and2.2. The ramp test results and values of chosen physiological and biochemical variables obtained, as well as the significance selleck products of differences between both series of testing during the experiment are presented in Table 3. Table 1 Average values of body mass and chosen variables of body composition in hypoxic (H) and control (C) groups during the experiment; *** – p<0.001, **-p<0.01, *- p<0.05 Table 2 Average values of the analyzed hematological variables in hypoxic (H) and control (C) groups during the experiment; *** - p<0.001, **-p<0.01, *- p<0.

05 Table 3 Average values of considered variables registered during the ramp test in the hypoxic (H) and control (C) groups, as well as the significance of differences between both series of testing during the experiment ; *** – p<0.001, **-p<0.01, ... A two-way analysis of variance showed a statistically significant effect of the two main factors (group & training) on registered variables during the ramp treadmill test, such as: total distance covered during the ramp test (F=14.268, p=0.003), maximal workload (WRmax; F=6.429, p=0.029), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, F=80.192, p=0.001), maximal heart rate (HRmax; F=5.914, p=0.048), maximal oxygen pulse (O2/HRmax; F=65.533, p=0.001), delta (��) values of lactate concentration during the test (��LA; F=5.441, p=0.049) and delta (��) values of lactate concentration during the 12min of recovery (��LA12��rec; F=9.442, p=0.012).

The training program used in this research did not significantly affect the analyzed hematological variables (RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV) (Table 2), as well as body mass and body composition (Table 1). Post hoc analysis The post-hoc analysis showed that the IHT caused a significant (p<0.001) increase in total distance covered during the ramp test protocol by 10% in the group H (Figure 1), as well as a 4.5% increase (p<0.01) in the absolute maximal workload (WRmax) and 6.2% (p<0.01) in relative values of this variable. Also, the absolute and relative values of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in this group increased significantly (p<0.001) by 6,5% and 7,8% (Figure 2). Figure 1 The total distance during the ramp test protocol in hypoxic (H) and control (C) groups before and after training; *** - p<0.

001 Figure 2 The relatives values of the maximal Brefeldin_A oxygen uptake (VO2max) observed during the ramp test in hypoxic (H) and control (C) groups before and after training; ** – p<0.01 Similar but minor changes were also observed in the group C. The post-hoc analysis showed that the interval training in normoxia caused a significant (p<0.05) increase in relative values of WRmax by 2.8%, as well as an increase (p<0.05) in absolute and relative values of VO2max by 1.3% and 2.1% respectively (Figure 2). However, a small but significant (p<0.05) decrease of 1.