2: upper panel). These spectra show a nearly symmetrical broad distribution about a peak emission at a wavelength of approximately 482 nm (FWHM values are around 85 nm). On

the other hand, all strains of V. azureus, except for LC1-989, produced light with a peak emission at approximately 472 nm in a narrow spectral band as indicated by a FWHM value of 66 nm (Fig. 2: lower panel). The emission spectrum of LC1-989 has a maximum wavelength of 480 nm and a broad shape (FWHM value of 81 nm) and is similar to the spectra of V. campbellii, V. harveyi, and V. jasicida. Widder and her colleagues reported that the light emission spectra of V. harveyi have the peak at 483 and 488 nm (FWMH values are 93 and 96 nm, respectively) (Widder et al., 1983). Another paper mentions that the emission peak of V. harveyi is at around ATM/ATR assay 490 nm (Herring, 1983). To our knowledge, a light emission peak at a wavelength shorter than 480 nm has not been previously reported for the genus Vibrio. In addition, the shape

of the spectrum produced by V. azureus tended to deviate from a Gaussian-like distribution. In the case of Photobacterium, the spectrum of blue-shifted light emission learn more induced by LumP (λmax ≈ 476 nm) also has an asymmetric shape and is narrower than the light emission produced by purified luciferase (Gast et al., 1978). It is, therefore, most likely that the light emission with the peak at 472 nm produced by V. azureus was a result of the luciferase–luciferin reaction interacting with an accessory protein. To examine whether the primary structure of luciferase could affect the light emission spectra, we determined the luxA gene sequences Edoxaban of the strains and analyzed these data. The phylogenetic tree based on the amino acid sequence data of luxA showed that the strains were clustered by species (Fig. 3). It has been reported previously that the luxA gene is useful in taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses of luminous bacteria (Haygood & Distel, 1993; Dunlap & Ast, 2005; Wada et al., 2006), and our analyses based on the luxA gene and MLSA also support these reports. However, this tree could not

discriminate LC1-989 from the other V. azureus strains, because the sequence data of LC1-989 shares 100% sequence identity with that of V. azureus NBRC 104587T. It is clear from this result that the light emissions peaking at 472 nm were not owing to any structural differences in luciferase, but were most likely due to the presence of other components, such as accessory fluorescent proteins. The GenBank accession numbers of sequences obtained in this study are shown in Table S1. From the results described above, we assumed that V. azureus, except for LC1-989, would carry an accessory blue fluorescent protein that modulates the light emission. We chose to examine NBRC 104587T, whose light emission spectrum peaks at 472 nm, for further biochemical analysis of bacterial intracellular proteins.