41 points) following high intensity exercise (90% of RM). All parameters of the study, grip strength and passing accuracy showed a significant decrease selleck catalog (p<0.05). Figure 3 shows the differences between pre and post measurements for the group 2. After applying the fatigue protocols the researcher compared between the two experimental groups in post-test for grip strength and passing accuracy by using post-test mean, standard deviations (SD) and significant differences. Table 3 shows a significant difference in the post measurements between the two experimental groups. The results showed no significant difference (p>0.05) in the performance between both groups regarding the grip strength and passing accuracy following fatigue protocols at exercise intensity (70% of 1 RM), and fatigue protocols at exercise intensity (90% of 1 RM).

Figure 3 Differences between pre and post measurements for group 2. Table 2 Means, standard deviations (SD) and significant differences between pre and post measurement for group (2) on handgrip strength and passing accuracy. Table 3 Means, standard deviations (SD) and significant differences in the post measurement between experimental groups on handgrip strength and passing accuracy. Discussion The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of upper extremity fatigue on grip strength and passing accuracy in basketball, and to ascertain if the effects of different fatigue protocols on grip strength and passing accuracy are similar. The results from this study showed that there were significant differences (p<0.

05) in the performance between pre-test, post-test for group 1 which used the dumbbell chest press as a fatigue protocol. The paired samples t-test was used to examine the mean difference in the performance at rest and the performance under the influence of exercise intensity of 70% of RM in the dominant hand grip, non-dominant hand grip and passing accuracy for group 1. It showed that there was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the results between the performance at rest and the performance following moderate intensity exercise. The same t-test was used to examine the mean difference in the performance at rest and the performance under the influence of exercise at intensity of 90% of RM, in the dominant hand grip, non-dominant hand grip and passing accuracy. The results showed that there was a significant difference (p<0.

05) in the performance Dacomitinib between the performance at rest and that following high intensity exercise. Figure 2 shows that there was a clear deterioration in the performance for group 1, which used the dumbbell chest press fatigue protocols. The paired samples t-test was used to examine the rate of decline or the change in the dominant hand grip, non-dominant hand grip and passing accuracy for group 2 from the rest to exercise of intensity 70% of RM. Results showed that there was a significant difference (p<0.