4225 Total costs covered by NHI 1,477,012 ± 378,827 1,449,149 ± 408,321

0.5189 Copayment by a patient 479,003 ± 115,575 461,984 ± 149,649 0.2511 Values are presented as KRW (Korean won, Korean monetary unit). 1 USD = 1,108 KRW. NHI, National Health Insurance. Discussion In Korea, the imaging modalities are so popular, and the payments are covered by national health insurance system. Radiologic evaluation could help surgeons to confirm the diagnosis and to recognize the location of appendix, and/or other intra-abdominal conditions requiring other LOXO-101 in vivo procedures. All patients in this study received radiologic evaluation such as abdominal computed tomography (CT), abdominal ultrasonography and they were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Appendectomy has still been the most common

non-elective surgical procedure performed by general surgeons [11, 12]. It was usually prepared at the time of diagnosis as appendicitis Combretastatin A4 nmr and done within hours to prevent the progression of inflammation. However, the quality of antibiotics was improved in the last few decades and interval appendectomy for periappendiceal abscess was shown better outcomes than early operation. Recent studies suggested that periappendiceal abscess in selected cases could be managed by nonsurgical treatment without interval appendectomy [13, 14]. Furthermore, successful results of nonsurgical antibiotics treatment for selected cases with uncomplicated appendicitis were Methisazone reported in recent literatures [6, 15, 16]. However, at the present, we do not agree that appendicitis is medical disease. Controversies regarding the timing of https://www.selleckchem.com/products/17-AAG(Geldanamycin).html operation in patients needed operation still exist. Some studies still supported that the outcomes of immediate or prompt appendectomy were better than those of delayed appendectomy [8–10, 17, 18]. They advocated that delayed appendectomy produced more postoperative complication such as surgical site infection. On the other hand, some studies suggested that there was no significant difference

of outcomes between early and delayed appendectomy [7, 19, 20]. In addition, several studies showed negative impact of prolonged working hours for residents or sleep deprivation on clinical performance and cognitive abilities [21, 22]. The timing of surgery was actually affected by other factors such as limited operating room availability, limited anesthesia availability, limited equipment availability, as well as decision of a surgeon like results in survey of pediatric surgeons [23]. In our hospital, all of eight surgeons preferred early appendectomy and they performed appendectomy within a few hours after diagnosis except midnight, if possible. However, number of surgical residents was reduced and diseases to need operation were increased during last decade. Therefore waiting time to appendectomy has been naturally lengthened although early appendectomy was planned.