In this process, MnO2 is transformed to Mn, and Li+ is inserted into the anode to format Li2O. The reaction is as NSC 683864 molecular weight follows: Figure 5 Cyclic voltammograms of MnO 2 materials. After five charging-discharging cycles measured at a scan rate of 0.05 mV s−1in the potential range of 0.01 ~ 3.60 V. (a) Caddice-clew-like and (b) urchin-like selleck MnO2 samples. (2) The oxidation peak is at about 1.18 V, corresponding to the charging process of the lithium-ion battery. During this process, Mn can facilitate the

decomposition of Li2O. The reaction of Li2O with Mn was as follows: (3) The current intensity of oxidation peak is much lower than that of reduction peak. The current intensity of reduction peak and oxidation peak for the urchin-like MnO2 material is 0.7828 and 0.1202 mA mg−1, respectively. The current intensity attenuation of oxidation peak indicates that Mn element could not completely convert to MnO2 during the charging process. The shapes of the CV curves for the MnO2 samples are similar, while urchin-like MnO2 material has higher peak intensity. The current intensity of reduction peak and oxidation peak for the caddice-clew-like MnO2 material is 0.3333

and 0.0712 mA mg−1, respectively. The asymmetry cyclic voltammogram curves in Figure 5 indicate that the discharging/charging process is irreversible. To exclude the influence of the MnO2 micromaterial density on the electrode, we have normalized the CV curve in Figure 5. According to the results of galvanostatical charge-discharge experiments and CV tests, the urchin-like MnO2 micromaterial GS-9973 mw is more superior than caddice-clew-like

MnO2 micromaterial. We presume the difference on electrochemical performance results from the morphology as both the MnO2 micromaterials have identical crystalline phase. Theoretically, nanomaterials with incompact structure are beneficial to improve the transmission rate and transfer ability of lithium ion. However, the discharge cycling stability of caddice-clew-like MnO2 micromaterial is poor. We guess the incompact structure may lead to easy electrode pulverization and loss of inter-particle contact during the repeated charging-discharging processes. A hollow structure which is another effective strategy to improve the cycling stability could provide extra C59 concentration free space for alleviating the structural strain and accommodating the large volume variation associated with repeated Li+ insertion/extraction processes. So, the relatively better discharge cycling stability may result from the hollow structure. In addition, the surface of urchin-like MnO2 is an arrangement of compact needle-like nanorods, which could improve the transmission rate and transfer ability of lithium ion. Therefore, the electrochemical performances of the MnO2 micromaterials indeed have relationship on their morphologies. The results suggest that the urchin-like MnO2 micromaterial is more promising for the anode of lithium-ion battery.