Of these, 14 were patient samples from the clinical unit with raised MCT and no apparent mastocytosis, 24 samples from patients with anaphylaxis and 13 samples from patients with mastocytosis. Five of 20 (25%) samples from the raised RF group (no prior knowledge of MCT) had raised MCT. Twenty-seven of 83 (33%) samples were RF-positive (Fig. 1). TSA HDAC purchase One of the WHO criteria for systemic mastocytosis is MCT > 20 µg/l. There were 51 of 83 patients with MCT > 20 µg/l. Five of these became MCT < 20 µg/l after HBT treatment. Toorenenbergen

et al. [6] used a value of 12% (four times the within-run CV%) to indicate any significant change in tryptase following treatment with the HBT tubes. However, in the samples with no detectable levels of RF (<9·8 IU/ml), a change in tryptase level (both positive and negative) of up to 17% (independent of baseline tryptase levels) was seen following HBT treatment. This suggested that there was a wide range of non-specific blocking taking place and/or a number of summative

errors within the analytical technique itself. A value of 17% was therefore chosen as the cut-off level above which any change was attributed to heterophile activity. Clearly, this may underestimate the true contribution of heterophilic antibodies to observed assay values. Of the samples, 14% ABT-263 cell line had false-positive MCT results – eight of 56 (14%) had raised levels pre-HBT which became normal following HBT blocking; these samples were deemed to be falsely elevated due to assay interference. Almost half the RF factor-positive patients had raised tryptase: 27 of 83 (32%) patients were RF-positive with a range of 15·3 to 4690 IU/ml; 12 of 27 (44%) RF-positive patients had raised tryptase values (>14 µg/l). Half the tryptase values in RF-positive sera showed evidence of heterophile antibody interference: 14 of 27 (52%) RF-positive patients had a decrease (>17%) in their tryptase concentration following

treatment with the HBT. In the RF-negative cohort only one sample Phloretin had >17% reduction. Of the raised tryptases in the RF-positive cohort, 57% were false positives: eight of 14 (57%) RF-positive samples had raised MCT levels (>14 µg/l) pre-HBT which became normal (<14 µg/l) post-block (false positives). Six of 14 RF-positive samples had a reduction of >17% in their MCT value but the pre- and post-tryptase values were <14 µg/l and so remained within the normal range at all times, even though there was evidence of heterophilic interference. The IgM RF concentrations were also variably reduced by up to 75% (Table 1). A significant association was observed between the presence of the IgM RF and heterophile interference. A χ2 test (Table 2) was performed and gave a value of 30·84 (P < 0·0001), suggesting a significant relationship between changes in tryptase level and the presence of RF in the patients’ serum, but clearly not all RF isotypes are bound by the HBT treatment and a perfect correlation would not be expected.