There has been ample KU-57788 in vitro recognition that many urologists worldwide operate on patients with no urodynamic studies at all, solely basing their operative intent on clinical complaints and imaging examinations believing that enlarged prostate gland is directly related to obstruction and urinary symptoms.[2, 3] We believe that the main reason this is done is due to the lack of recognition of the importance and experience of the urodynamic examination in helping to decide the best option in a particular clinical situation, or difficulties in the availability of the exam

due to regional differences. Although it is expected that a regular residency program should provide sufficient training, the amount to accomplish that was not established and therefore some centers may not instruct urodynamicists with

am appropriate volume of exams. This prospective study evaluated 64 junior urologists after an intensive 4-month period at the urodynamic lab and 110 urologists attending voiding dysfunction courses and their modification in attitude after experiencing learn more the exam. Moreover, we looked at how urologists modified their clinical practice after being exposed to intense urodynamic practice as well as how it impacted their rank scale on auxiliary exams and other decisive parameters to decide who should have operations and when. Sixty-four consecutive junior urologists (median age: 29 ± 2.7) admitted to a fellowship program in voiding dysfunction in a 4-month period were prospectively studied with paired questionnaires before and after the mentioned period of training. All enrolled see more junior-urologists finished the regular 4-year training period (2 years on general surgery followed by 2–3 years on urology – median 2.7) before the intensive fellowship and all of them were board eligible, although only 37.5% were board-certified.

The certified urologists performed more than 50 transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) during their training program as a minimum requirement to apply to the national Board of Certification. The median time of urological practice before applying to the fellowship was 2.8 ± 0.21 years. The fellowship program allowed the junior urologist to do more than 400 full-urodynamic exams with free-flow rate, followed by cystometry phase and EMG-P/Q or video-urodynamic depending on the case, under supervision allowing deep and interactive discussion on all exams in a tertiary urodynamic center – 1200 urodynamics per year with a board certified urologist specialized in urodynamics and voiding dysfunctions. Junior urologists were asked to complete questionnaires before and after the 4-month period to measure the impact of formal urodynamic training on the perception of the value of the exam, as well as the scale of different parameters on the appropriate BPH management.