Table 1 Definitions of high, very high, and extreme altitude. Table 2 Changes in barometric pressure and inspired PO2 with altitude.* ACUTE MOUNTAIN SICKNESS (AMS) Acute mountain sickness has been recognized for centuries. As early as two thousand years ago, a Chinese official warned of the dangers of crossing from China into what is now probably Afghanistan. Travelers, he said, would have to cross the “Little Headache Mountain” and the “Great Headache Mountain” where “men’s bodies become feverish, they lose color and are attacked with headache and vomiting”.2 Although high altitude is defined as beginning at an elevation of 1,500 m (5,000
feet), symptoms are rarely present at 1,500 m but become Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical increasingly common with rapid ascent to higher elevations. Studies conducted in Nepal, Colorado, Kilimanjaro, and the Alps show a prevalence of AMS ranging from 9% to 58%,
with a higher prevalence at higher altitudes (Table 3).3–7 AMS is typically Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical associated with headache variably accompanied by loss of appetite, disturbed sleep, nausea, fatigue, and dizziness beginning within 12 hours of ascent in two-thirds of susceptible subjects and within 36 hours in the remaining third.3 Although more advanced forms of AMS may be accompanied by peripheral edema, periorbital edema, a change in mental status, ataxia, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical or rales, the initial absence of any definitive signs usually requires clinicians Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and researchers to rely on subjective symptoms for the diagnosis. Table 3 Prevalence of acute mountain sickness (AMS). Symptom rating is reasonably reliable for intra-subject evaluation where a person compares his or her current symptoms to a base-line status, but symptom rating becomes much more problematic for inter-subject comparisons since there is no standard of discomfort giving the same score for all subjects. The subjective nature of AMS has resulted in the development
of several self-scoring grading systems to determine the presence of AMS and to click here quantitate its severity. A very Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical straightforward and common grading system for diagnosing AMS is the Lake Louise self-assessment questionnaire (Table 4), with headache and a score ≥ 3 representing AMS, but other cut-off points and other scoring systems are in common use.8–12 These scoring systems are not linearly correlated and do not give equivalent results; for this reason, study results are often dependent on the scoring system Thymidine kinase and cut-off points used to determine the presence or absence of AMS. The literature is further complicated by the fact that many studies are observational investigations, where the many confounding variables (home elevation, rate of ascent, etc.) cannot be taken into account. To avoid the difficulty of controlled and randomized studies in the field, a large number of studies have also been carried out in decompression (hypobaric) chambers. Table 4 Lake Louise self-assessment AMS scoring system.